Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49431 - 49440 of 57699 for id.
Search results 49431 - 49440 of 57699 for id.
State v. Enrique Pazo-More
to undermine confidence in the outcome of the proceeding. See id. at 544-45, 370 N.W.2d at 232-33. “Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12622 - 2005-03-31
to undermine confidence in the outcome of the proceeding. See id. at 544-45, 370 N.W.2d at 232-33. “Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12622 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of this information. Id., ¶20. Here, we are satisfied that Hertzberg validly waived his right to counsel on direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113484 - 2014-06-03
of this information. Id., ¶20. Here, we are satisfied that Hertzberg validly waived his right to counsel on direct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113484 - 2014-06-03
Milprint, Inc. v. Randy L. Flynn
. Id. Whether a covenant is enforceable as reasonably necessary is a question of law, resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26545 - 2006-09-20
. Id. Whether a covenant is enforceable as reasonably necessary is a question of law, resolved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26545 - 2006-09-20
State v. Timothy J. Davids
representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688; see also State v. Ambuehl, 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12153 - 2005-03-31
representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” Id. at 688; see also State v. Ambuehl, 145
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12153 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
by the preponderance of evidence that there is a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing the plea. Id. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126104 - 2014-11-03
by the preponderance of evidence that there is a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing the plea. Id. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126104 - 2014-11-03
Design Services v. DNR
because our review is limited to the record before the agency. Id. In any event, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
because our review is limited to the record before the agency. Id. In any event, the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21626 - 2006-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason why the newly alleged errors were not previously raised. Id. at 185. We determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928504 - 2025-03-18
a sufficient reason why the newly alleged errors were not previously raised. Id. at 185. We determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928504 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a manifest injustice, such as a plea that was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Id. Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
a manifest injustice, such as a plea that was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Id. Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749724 - 2024-01-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to judgment as a matter of law. Id. The material facts are not in dispute: Bonnie purchased a home before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
to judgment as a matter of law. Id. The material facts are not in dispute: Bonnie purchased a home before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027567 - 2025-10-22
State v. Robert J. Lochemes
and therefore did not compromise Lochemes’s decision about whether to submit to the chemical test. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2005-03-31
and therefore did not compromise Lochemes’s decision about whether to submit to the chemical test. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2005-03-31