Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49441 - 49450 of 57699 for id.
Search results 49441 - 49450 of 57699 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. In determining child support No. 2007AP2905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42253 - 2014-09-15
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. In determining child support No. 2007AP2905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42253 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
‘an objective standard of reasonableness.’” Id., ¶7. To demonstrate prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36188 - 2014-09-15
‘an objective standard of reasonableness.’” Id., ¶7. To demonstrate prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
situation which is based solely upon the judge’s state of mind. See id. As to the objective situations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
situation which is based solely upon the judge’s state of mind. See id. As to the objective situations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Johnson
, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 490 (emphasis added). Apprendi does not aid Johnson; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 490 (emphasis added). Apprendi does not aid Johnson; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
infraction are—or reasonably should have been—completed.” Id. at 349 (emphasis added). This means
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622166 - 2023-02-14
infraction are—or reasonably should have been—completed.” Id. at 349 (emphasis added). This means
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622166 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
Victor Salbashian v. David C. Matzke
31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. The interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14275 - 2014-09-15
31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. The interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14275 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Nichols
for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id. We will not overturn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
for the challenged conduct are factual and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. See id. We will not overturn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14094 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of them. Id. (citations omitted). ¶8 As a threshold matter, the parties dispute whether Morgan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56315 - 2010-11-03
of them. Id. (citations omitted). ¶8 As a threshold matter, the parties dispute whether Morgan’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56315 - 2010-11-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
for sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Id. at 288-89. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31343 - 2014-09-15
for sentence modification on the basis of a new factor. Id. at 288-89. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
and proceeded on a correct theory of law. See id. at 31-32, 310 N.W.2d at 609. Christensen apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8003 - 2017-09-19
and proceeded on a correct theory of law. See id. at 31-32, 310 N.W.2d at 609. Christensen apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8003 - 2017-09-19