Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49451 - 49460 of 83976 for simple case search.
Search results 49451 - 49460 of 83976 for simple case search.
State v. Jeffrey L. Sheets
device or immobilization is mandatory, not discretionary. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8853 - 2005-03-31
device or immobilization is mandatory, not discretionary. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
release. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032491 - 2025-11-04
release. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032491 - 2025-11-04
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Antjuan E.
. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4230 - 2005-03-31
. and H.N. cases, and the other cases they discuss in which the trial court lost competency to proceed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4230 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
FA-4139V: Financial Disclosure Statement
of the county in which this case is filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY Enter the name
/formdisplay/FA-4139V.doc?formNumber=FA-4139V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-31
of the county in which this case is filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY Enter the name
/formdisplay/FA-4139V.doc?formNumber=FA-4139V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2023-01-31
CA Blank Order
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141719 - 2015-05-11
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141719 - 2015-05-11
Lawanda McDowell v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
. I request that you allow the additional time. The case is still months away from trial. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11283 - 2005-03-31
. I request that you allow the additional time. The case is still months away from trial. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11283 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of his own case. In light of this information, Perner cannot show that he was prejudiced by the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107730 - 2014-02-05
of his own case. In light of this information, Perner cannot show that he was prejudiced by the failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107730 - 2014-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. ¶2 This is the third time Joseph’s case is before this court. Joseph was convicted of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157698 - 2017-09-21
affirm. ¶2 This is the third time Joseph’s case is before this court. Joseph was convicted of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157698 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Patterson
that a delinquency adjudication “is not admissible as evidence against the juvenile in any case or proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15488 - 2017-09-21
that a delinquency adjudication “is not admissible as evidence against the juvenile in any case or proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15488 - 2017-09-21