Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49461 - 49470 of 59051 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Robert F. Pagac
of marijuana. Pagac filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained at his house, claiming the judge lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4997 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert F. Pagac
the evidence obtained at his house, claiming the judge lacked probable cause to issue the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4997 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
intended to convert it at a later date, but claims he did not convert it to his use until he received
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181514 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Instead, she intersperses claims the officers had no legitimate concern about their safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43611 - 2009-11-16

COURT OF APPEALS
to their claim for negligence and property damage, the [Trust] certainly would not be entitled to recover any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69199 - 2011-08-08

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
as without merit, and we will not discuss them further. There also is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994592 - 2025-08-13

[PDF] Darrell D. Cage v. Gary R. McCaughtry
was such that the committee might reasonably make the determination in question). Cage waived the claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13859 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22

Town of Vernon v. Village of Big Bend
appeals from an order which dismissed its claim that the Village of Big Bend improperly annexed land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14894 - 2005-03-31

Kenneth Gable v. Sheriff James Kanikula
termination. The commission refused to grant a hearing on the claim of constructive discharge. Our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11390 - 2005-03-31