Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
2007 WI APP 30
to sentence credit for days spent in custody while in conditional jail time status, even if that custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27900 - 2007-02-27
to sentence credit for days spent in custody while in conditional jail time status, even if that custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27900 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the police lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26
the court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that the police lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919511 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consecutive to sentences Garcia was then serving. The circuit court adopted the joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
consecutive to sentences Garcia was then serving. The circuit court adopted the joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
WI 73
. The Commission supplied a summary of accomplishments and activities to the Court at a joint meeting on March
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172236 - 2017-09-21
. The Commission supplied a summary of accomplishments and activities to the Court at a joint meeting on March
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172236 - 2017-09-21
James E. Parry v. Judy A. Parry
the parties’ joint income exceeded $60,000 per year. In light of the nineteen-year marriage and the detriment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13667 - 2005-03-31
the parties’ joint income exceeded $60,000 per year. In light of the nineteen-year marriage and the detriment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed sentences consistent with the joint recommendation. The record discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240733 - 2019-05-14
imposed sentences consistent with the joint recommendation. The record discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240733 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
Chapter 99 - Construction of Supreme Court Rules
clearly as to preclude judicial construction. (8) Joint authority, how exercised. All words
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092 - 2017-09-20
clearly as to preclude judicial construction. (8) Joint authority, how exercised. All words
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092 - 2017-09-20
State v. Michael Stubbs
in a place immediately accessible to the accused and subject to his [or her] exclusive or joint dominion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9695 - 2005-03-31
in a place immediately accessible to the accused and subject to his [or her] exclusive or joint dominion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kaukauna Area School District v. State of Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
to consider any information that it might consider relevant, see Joint Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. State Appeal Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10329 - 2017-09-20
to consider any information that it might consider relevant, see Joint Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. State Appeal Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10329 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael Stubbs
or joint dominion and control, provided that the accused has knowledge of the presence of the drug." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9695 - 2017-09-19
or joint dominion and control, provided that the accused has knowledge of the presence of the drug." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9695 - 2017-09-19