Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
Sister Mary Felten v. Frank A. Dolezal
is a question of law which we review de novo. "[A] case is moot when the decision sought by the parties cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7770 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. "[A] case is moot when the decision sought by the parties cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7770 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard Boho
a phone call violates the “no contact” condition of bail presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
a phone call violates the “no contact” condition of bail presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dietreich Andrew Wilson
violate a defendant's right to due process is a question of law subject to de novo review.... Relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9896 - 2005-03-31
violate a defendant's right to due process is a question of law subject to de novo review.... Relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9896 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to sentence credit under this statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Lange
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106875 - 2014-01-21
to sentence credit under this statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Lange
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106875 - 2014-01-21
Julie Young v. Wal-Mart Store,Inc.
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10388 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10388 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randall T. Riley
which this court reviews de novo. See State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190, 191 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13537 - 2005-03-31
which this court reviews de novo. See State v. King, 175 Wis.2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190, 191 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13537 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven J. Tobey
of a statute to a set of facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9220 - 2005-03-31
of a statute to a set of facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See K.N.K. v. Buhler, 139
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Allen P. Tappa v. Gregory T. Barutha
is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist as to Barutha's alleged noncooperation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8375 - 2017-09-19
is de novo. Id. Material questions of fact exist as to Barutha's alleged noncooperation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8375 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172226 - 2017-09-21
subject to de novo review. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172226 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ arguments, the court suggested this was a “de facto summary judgment situation” and asked whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
’ arguments, the court suggested this was a “de facto summary judgment situation” and asked whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12