Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4951 - 4960 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Chandra D. Dennis
demonstrated the existence of a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9265 - 2017-09-19
demonstrated the existence of a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9265 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Chris J. Jacobs v. Gary R. McCaughtry
review of a prison disciplinary decision is de novo. See State ex rel. Anderson-el. v. Cooke, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6259 - 2017-09-19
review of a prison disciplinary decision is de novo. See State ex rel. Anderson-el. v. Cooke, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6259 - 2017-09-19
Traci J. Purdy v. Brian M. Purdy
court were we reviewing its decision de novo, our standard of review requires that we affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
court were we reviewing its decision de novo, our standard of review requires that we affirm in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3813 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶4 Although cast as a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98489 - 2013-06-24
that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶9. ¶4 Although cast as a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98489 - 2013-06-24
State v. Annie B. Jenkins
), whether a circumstance is a “new factor” is an issue of law that we resolve de novo, State v. Ambrose, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10156 - 2005-03-31
), whether a circumstance is a “new factor” is an issue of law that we resolve de novo, State v. Ambrose, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10156 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we will use the facts to conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we will use the facts to conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Draughon, 2005 WI App 162, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806594 - 2024-05-29
the facts of the case is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Draughon, 2005 WI App 162, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806594 - 2024-05-29
State v. Michael Solomon
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert a. de chambeau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15371 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert a. de chambeau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
barred presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
barred presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259151 - 2020-05-06
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a new factor is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. Here, the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31