Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49501 - 49510 of 60440 for two.
Search results 49501 - 49510 of 60440 for two.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is unpersuasive for two reasons. First, the State fulfilled its own obligation under the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
is unpersuasive for two reasons. First, the State fulfilled its own obligation under the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there was reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact, to which we apply a two-step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
there was reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop is a question of constitutional fact, to which we apply a two-step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentencing because he told the court on two occasions he came into this case late. Sparks also emphasizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
for sentencing because he told the court on two occasions he came into this case late. Sparks also emphasizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a second or subsequent offense, and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787417 - 2024-04-16
as a second or subsequent offense, and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787417 - 2024-04-16
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
was not allowed to present two witnesses to testify in his defense; and (5) he was not allowed to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
was not allowed to present two witnesses to testify in his defense; and (5) he was not allowed to cross-examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for two reasons. First, she contends Dave’s opinion that she was not competent to refuse medication did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82799 - 2012-05-21
for two reasons. First, she contends Dave’s opinion that she was not competent to refuse medication did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82799 - 2012-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
p.m., officer Jason Mork pulled two motorcycles over for speeding. The drivers were identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80137 - 2012-03-26
p.m., officer Jason Mork pulled two motorcycles over for speeding. The drivers were identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80137 - 2012-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
(1994). We agree, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lopez pled guilty to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29476 - 2007-06-25
(1994). We agree, and accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lopez pled guilty to two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29476 - 2007-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. [3] In July 2013, Renee and Jay also filed a motion for declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110153 - 2014-04-09
. and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. [3] In July 2013, Renee and Jay also filed a motion for declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110153 - 2014-04-09
2010 WI APP 7
creates two factual issues: whether the 35%-light-pass-through requirement is met and whether the window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44952 - 2010-01-26
creates two factual issues: whether the 35%-light-pass-through requirement is met and whether the window
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44952 - 2010-01-26