Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49511 - 49520 of 60868 for divorce form s.
Search results 49511 - 49520 of 60868 for divorce form s.
[PDF]
State v. Aaron N.
. We granted Aaron N.’s petitions for leave to appeal on July 17, 2003. Nos. 03-1874, 03-1875
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6671 - 2017-09-20
. We granted Aaron N.’s petitions for leave to appeal on July 17, 2003. Nos. 03-1874, 03-1875
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6671 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the actual number of days spent ‘in custody’ on Count 2 that are to be credited toward Count 1’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636106 - 2023-03-23
the actual number of days spent ‘in custody’ on Count 2 that are to be credited toward Count 1’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636106 - 2023-03-23
[PDF]
WI APP 57
. The record does not show that the circuit court analyzed that question. “[A]s a matter of federal law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110005 - 2017-09-21
. The record does not show that the circuit court analyzed that question. “[A]s a matter of federal law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110005 - 2017-09-21
County of Rock v. Gibson T. Gilmore
or procedure of the agency. “Rule” does not include, and s. 227.10 does not apply to, any action or inaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6573 - 2005-03-31
or procedure of the agency. “Rule” does not include, and s. 227.10 does not apply to, any action or inaction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6573 - 2005-03-31
Secura Insurance v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2220 - 2005-03-31
: MICHAEL S. GIBBS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, P.J., Anderson and Snyder, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine the length of a revocation under s. 343.30(1q)(b) and to determine the penalty under ss. 114.09(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
to determine the length of a revocation under s. 343.30(1q)(b) and to determine the penalty under ss. 114.09(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132818 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
for his client and became a mouthpiece for the [S]tate.” Lowe asserts that trial counsel’s “acquiescence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
for his client and became a mouthpiece for the [S]tate.” Lowe asserts that trial counsel’s “acquiescence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95179 - 2013-04-08
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
was correct: THE COURT: [I]s the statement of the two crimes for which sentencing is to occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2008-02-29
was correct: THE COURT: [I]s the statement of the two crimes for which sentencing is to occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2008-02-29
Michael W. Bruzas v. Cipriano Quezada-Garcia
The court of appeals upheld the right of subrogation. The court observed that “[s]ubrogation provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
The court of appeals upheld the right of subrogation. The court observed that “[s]ubrogation provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A subsequent search of Mr. Rodriguez’[s] residence revealed sandwich baggies and $2900 in U.S. currency. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92114 - 2014-09-15
. A subsequent search of Mr. Rodriguez’[s] residence revealed sandwich baggies and $2900 in U.S. currency. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92114 - 2014-09-15