Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49531 - 49540 of 68410 for law.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, adequately considered and gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247831 - 2020-01-30

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6219 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
a circuit court has lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6215 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, when the court’s exercise of discretion turns on a question of law, we review the legal question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107438 - 2014-01-27

[PDF] State v. Robert Gordon
that the “defense counsel shared responsibility with the prosecutor and judge for what should have been a lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8670 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The Estate of Mildred Furgason and the Estate of John Furgason v.
an agency’s conclusions of law under one of three levels of deference—great weight, due weight, or de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11503 - 2017-09-19

State v. Donald A. Lesavage
). However, whether a set of facts constitutes probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Bolling, 222 Wis. 2d 558, 563. No. 2019AP2001 5 ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344158 - 2021-03-09

CA Blank Order
53039 Timothy T. O'Connell O'Connell Law Office 403 S. Jefferson St. Green Bay, WI 54301 Gregory M
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103179 - 2013-10-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review without deference to the [circuit] court.” Zimmerman v. DHSS, 169 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432281 - 2021-09-28