Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49551 - 49560 of 76247 for i j.
Search results 49551 - 49560 of 76247 for i j.
[PDF]
WI APP 91
, J. This is a sick-leave-benefits case similar to the one we decided in Champine v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21
, J. This is a sick-leave-benefits case similar to the one we decided in Champine v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 22
G. MIRON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106579 - 2017-09-21
G. MIRON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 STARK, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Saint Joseph's Hospital of Marshfield, Inc. v.
of the circuit court for Dane County: RICHARD J. CALLAWAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12304 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Dane County: RICHARD J. CALLAWAY, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jevon Jones Jaconi
PER CURIAM. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Jevon J. Jaconi and the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16801 - 2017-09-21
PER CURIAM. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Jevon J. Jaconi and the Office of Lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: THE COURT: All right. [Counsel], I had a couple questions on your brief. You spent a fair amount of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965303 - 2025-06-04
: THE COURT: All right. [Counsel], I had a couple questions on your brief. You spent a fair amount of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965303 - 2025-06-04
[PDF]
All City Communication Company, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. The dispute in this case arises from an assessment by the Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5222 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J. The dispute in this case arises from an assessment by the Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5222 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and cause remanded. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31586 - 2008-02-19
and cause remanded. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31586 - 2008-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. KELLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Roman Ozimek appeals an order revoking his privilege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592128 - 2022-11-22
. KELLEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HRUZ, J.1 Roman Ozimek appeals an order revoking his privilege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592128 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
on the representation to their damage. See WIS J I—CIVIL 2403. In Meracle v. Children's Serv. Soc., 149 Wis.2d 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11186 - 2017-09-19
on the representation to their damage. See WIS J I—CIVIL 2403. In Meracle v. Children's Serv. Soc., 149 Wis.2d 19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11186 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David A. Foy
. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. David Foy appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Deininger, JJ. VERGERONT, J. David Foy appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20

