Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49551 - 49560 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49551 - 49560 of 74849 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218904 - 2018-09-07
an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious issues that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218904 - 2018-09-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
State v. Susan L. Bauer
clerk Robin Cavanaugh, was entered against Bauer. The record does not contain a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17897 - 2005-05-02
clerk Robin Cavanaugh, was entered against Bauer. The record does not contain a written order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17897 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Przytarski’s accusations against the circuit court are conclusory and wholly unsupported by the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646838 - 2023-04-25
, Przytarski’s accusations against the circuit court are conclusory and wholly unsupported by the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646838 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
Winnebago County v. Andrew O.
proceeding. We first note that the record does not reveal any present attempts by the County to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7496 - 2005-03-31
proceeding. We first note that the record does not reveal any present attempts by the County to commit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143688 - 2017-09-21
State v. Clifton L. Watts
not have any written record of Shipp’s statement. The statement was made to an assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
not have any written record of Shipp’s statement. The statement was made to an assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460686 - 2021-12-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=460686 - 2021-12-07
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91890 - 2013-01-16
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91890 - 2013-01-16