Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49571 - 49580 of 73534 for ha.

State v. Donald R. Wield
is a persistent repeat offender if he or she “has been convicted of a serious child sex offense on at least one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5584 - 2005-03-31

Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
Milwaukee Ordinance 295-814(3), the Common Council has to act on a “planned development application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14430 - 2005-03-31

Benedetta Balistrieri v. Joseph P. Balistrieri
and also that the [six-year] statute of limitations for conversion [under Wis. Stat. § 893.51] ha[d] long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5367 - 2005-03-31

Apex Electronics Corporation v. James Gee
rather than of fact, when the question of law has been briefed by both parties and when the question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17210 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
information that they had that maybe he doesn’t know to determine how far the investigation has gone, what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001148 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sufficiently material facts that, if true, entitle the defendant to relief, the defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246825 - 2019-09-19

[PDF] Kevin Peace v. Northwestern National Insurance Company
omitted). Any question about whether an "insurance company has a duty to defend is resolved in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10336 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
of stipulation Mr. Stechauner has on five previous occasions been convicted of offenses. He has had significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28573 - 2007-03-26

State v. David J. Roberson
of counsel when: (1) the defendant has failed to allege sufficient facts in the motion to raise a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19422 - 2005-09-19

State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
for the proposition that the oral pronouncement of conditions has no evidentiary value. Moreover, the bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2760 - 2005-03-31