Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49571 - 49580 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49571 - 49580 of 74849 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
of the record, we 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=493100 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Phillip E. Bacon
in the waiver of the preliminary hearing on the record. Bacon has established neither deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10011 - 2017-09-19
in the waiver of the preliminary hearing on the record. Bacon has established neither deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
not filed a response. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report, Czysz’s response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
consideration of the report, Czysz’s response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=623268 - 2023-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558439 - 2022-08-23
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558439 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit report, and following an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
of the no- merit report, and following an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821310 - 2024-07-03
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142936 - 2015-06-16
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record and jury trial, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142936 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Commission. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139857 - 2017-09-21
Commission. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139857 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Gulley
not have any written record of Shipp’s statement. The statement was made to an assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10535 - 2005-03-31
not have any written record of Shipp’s statement. The statement was made to an assistant district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10535 - 2005-03-31