Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49581 - 49590 of 59232 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Bruce Lurye v. Gary Buchli
to his argument that he claims support his contention that he never received the credits. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15584 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
to establish a sufficient reason why his claims were not raised in his initial appeal. See State v. Lo, 2003
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111421 - 2014-05-06

State v. Robert J. Pettis
address the constitutional rights waived by the pleas. Pettis further claims that although the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Keith E. Broadnax
1997, he received two checks from an insurer as part of the settlement of a client’s claim. Those
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17413 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the statutory language to buttress its claim that the condemnor had to serve a recorded copy of the conveyance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79435 - 2012-03-13

James Zielinski v. Keith Govier
that they had no reasonable basis for obtaining temporary or permanent relief. Despite claiming a “right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14613 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Meurer
this premise, the State correctly observes that the law does not recognize a claim of “subjective confusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7623 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. In it, he claimed that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. Wyman also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21

State v. Richard L. Nemetz
for a tip, though, because police may assess the basis of the informant’s claimed knowledge and hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6701 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for operating while intoxicated, second offense. Tonnancour claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28840 - 2007-04-30