Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49591 - 49600 of 60436 for divorce form s.

[PDF] NOTICE
of proving whether a “setoff should be afforded during a restitution proceeding ... lie[s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52903 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert L. Dumas
located in a public place whenever there is “probable cause to believe the vehicle contain[s] contraband
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Baraboo v. Gary G. Ranum
if he was prepared to proceed, he answered “[a]s best I can without an attorney.” The court responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4040 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waupaca County: Raymond S. Huber, Judge. Reversed. Before Higginbotham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34264 - 2008-10-08

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, the defendant’s culpability, and the defendant’s remorse. Id. “[S]entencing courts must individualize
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215556 - 2018-07-11

[PDF] Hayward Community Credit Union v. Joe Isham
as provided in s. 403.419 (5) or by agreement of the affected parties, a party having joint and several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2216 - 2017-09-19

District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
have benefitted him at sentencing.” Id. The court concluded that, under the facts of the case, “[s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28

[PDF] NOTICE
of the crime(s) to which I am pleading based upon the facts in the criminal complaint and/or the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57881 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 05, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
under s. 809.30(2).” § 973.19(5). Clearly, Stapleton’s motion did not meet the criteria of § 973.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27314 - 2006-12-04

Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
because of a violation of this chapter may sue the violator directly under s. 100.20(5), Stats., and may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5164 - 2005-03-31