Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4961 - 4970 of 34382 for WA 0812 2782 5310 [[Pandawa KacaFilm]] Proyek Kaca Film UV Protection Eromoko Wonogiri.

State v. James G. Luck
that the statute does not infringe on the rights protected by the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, we evaluate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4282 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with the objective of protecting the public and for punishment. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶40, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157353 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bridget P.
. They were found to be children in need of protection or services (CHIPS) on January 4, 1995. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6961 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Douglas Royster
were not gas appliances. At sentencing, when discussing “punishment, deterrence and protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9122 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
an appropriate sentence: the gravity of the offense, the character of the defendant, and the need to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92279 - 2013-02-04

COURT OF APPEALS
to the community and that reconfinement was necessary to protect the community from him. After noting that five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
easy to slip back into your old ways and reoffend. There’s a need for protection of the public. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55650 - 2010-10-18

Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
of protection or services. At Douglas’s request, Brandon was placed with Douglas. Brandon remained there until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14564 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the first sentencing objective was the need for community protection. This objective is not altered by Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02

State v. Anthony A. Parker
it, the extensive and permanent harm to the victim resulting from her burns, and the public’s need for protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2672 - 2005-03-31