Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49611 - 49620 of 67063 for ct.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was filed. See State v. Barksdale, 160 Wis. 2d 284, 291, 466 N.W.2d 198 (Ct. App. 1991) (generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155450 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. William J. Ludwig
to harmonize their meaning. State v. Robinson, 140 Wis. 2d 673, 677, 412 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1987). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15313 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Waylon A. Meyer
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP1774-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2002CF409 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2012AP1418-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CT125 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88591 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lee Kremsreiter v. Marathon County
, 390, 504 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1993). Here, neither we nor the trial No. 95-0353
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8606 - 2017-09-19

Kurt Ohrmundt v. Greg Demark
, 496 N.W.2d 613 (Ct. App. 1992) is misplaced, as Pattermann is distinguishable from the facts presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13610 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). The court’s colloquy, buttressed by the plea questionnaire and waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2013AP1246-CR Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121446 - 2014-09-16

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 515 N.W.2d 923 (Ct. App. 1994). Additionally, the validity of the probation revocation itself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270034 - 2020-07-22

CA Blank Order
. Harrington, 181 Wis. 2d 985, 989, 512 N.W.2d 261 (Ct. App. 1994). Noting that the plea questionnaire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97572 - 2013-06-04