Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49641 - 49650 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49641 - 49650 of 74849 for public records.
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114773 - 2014-06-12
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114773 - 2014-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662652 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Andrew O.
that the record does not reveal any present attempts by the County to commit Andrew. We will not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7496 - 2017-09-20
that the record does not reveal any present attempts by the County to commit Andrew. We will not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7496 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719469 - 2023-10-26
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133571 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Goldie H.
was required to hold a summary hearing on the record to extend the protective placement; and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
was required to hold a summary hearing on the record to extend the protective placement; and (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471348 - 2022-01-13
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471348 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214798 - 2018-06-26
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214798 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Rice
March 17, 1995. Rice asserts that the record contains no indication that he received a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
March 17, 1995. Rice asserts that the record contains no indication that he received a copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211797 - 2018-04-25