Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49681 - 49690 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 49681 - 49690 of 60214 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 32
of actual service, whether or not judicial education credits for attending the annual meeting are claimed
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31346 - 2014-09-15
of actual service, whether or not judicial education credits for attending the annual meeting are claimed
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31346 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as inadmissible hearsay constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. A claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
as inadmissible hearsay constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. A claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to support Lusk’s plea. In his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal, Lusk claimed the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
to support Lusk’s plea. In his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal, Lusk claimed the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91814 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. John McClellan
. Affirmed. SULLIVAN, J. John McClellan appeals pro se from a small claims judgment awarding State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9164 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. SULLIVAN, J. John McClellan appeals pro se from a small claims judgment awarding State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9164 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.25(3)(c). The test is whether, under all of the circumstances, “‘the claim is so indefensible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204872 - 2017-12-07
809.25(3)(c). The test is whether, under all of the circumstances, “‘the claim is so indefensible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204872 - 2017-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. The no-merit report also addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241300 - 2019-05-24
arguable merit. The no-merit report also addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241300 - 2019-05-24
[PDF]
Sheila L. Davis v. Carey K. Davis
$4,931. Carey claimed the stipulated sum, $15,400, included interest. His counsel maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
$4,931. Carey claimed the stipulated sum, $15,400, included interest. His counsel maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2589 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive given the facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
. There would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive given the facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219324 - 2018-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not understand its role and was potentially influenced by public perception.” He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-15
did not understand its role and was potentially influenced by public perception.” He also claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-15