Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4971 - 4980 of 68870 for he.
Search results 4971 - 4980 of 68870 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
the influence (OWI) as a fifth offense. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8696 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8696 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argues that these claims are based only on his allegation that the defendants later refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44980 - 2009-12-22
. He argues that these claims are based only on his allegation that the defendants later refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44980 - 2009-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
as a party to a crime. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.203(2)(a), 943.38(2), and 939.05 (2009-10).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75794 - 2011-12-27
as a party to a crime. See Wis. Stat. §§ 943.203(2)(a), 943.38(2), and 939.05 (2009-10).[1] He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75794 - 2011-12-27
[PDF]
State v. David Lee Greenwood
in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12543 - 2017-09-21
in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12543 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roger A. McGinnis
on these issues. McGinnis concedes that he was driving after revocation of his license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9887 - 2005-03-31
on these issues. McGinnis concedes that he was driving after revocation of his license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9887 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Lee Greenwood
) and 961.41(3g)c, Stats. Greenwood claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
) and 961.41(3g)c, Stats. Greenwood claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28100 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.203(2)(a), 943.38(2), No. 2010AP2816-CR 2 and 939.05 (2009-10).1 He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75794 - 2014-09-15
. §§ 943.203(2)(a), 943.38(2), No. 2010AP2816-CR 2 and 939.05 (2009-10).1 He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75794 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. He argues that his pleas were not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31