Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49701 - 49710 of 51893 for him.
Search results 49701 - 49710 of 51893 for him.
COURT OF APPEALS
-plea status, with all of the original charges against him restored; not just the felony child sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34645 - 2008-11-17
-plea status, with all of the original charges against him restored; not just the felony child sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34645 - 2008-11-17
State v. Trina J.
at the January 26, 1996 status conference. Another attorney appeared for him, however, and the record includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10923 - 2005-03-31
at the January 26, 1996 status conference. Another attorney appeared for him, however, and the record includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10923 - 2005-03-31
WI App 25 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2011AP1338 2011AP1339 Compl...
and adjudicated him guilty. As a penalty, the court imposed “a forfeiture plus costs” totaling $200.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77018 - 2012-02-28
and adjudicated him guilty. As a penalty, the court imposed “a forfeiture plus costs” totaling $200.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77018 - 2012-02-28
[PDF]
and belong solely to him, and that the paperwork listing Jonathan and Porsche as joint titleholders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070496 - 2026-01-29
and belong solely to him, and that the paperwork listing Jonathan and Porsche as joint titleholders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070496 - 2026-01-29
State v. Michael J. W.
adjudicating him the father of Lily R.A.P., notwithstanding a jury verdict which found he was not Lily’s father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9857 - 2005-03-31
adjudicating him the father of Lily R.A.P., notwithstanding a jury verdict which found he was not Lily’s father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9857 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in favor of Burke on the basis that there was insufficient evidence to support this claim against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81265 - 2012-04-18
in favor of Burke on the basis that there was insufficient evidence to support this claim against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81265 - 2012-04-18
Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
is Melvin’s testimony that before they purchased their lot, the owner of lot nine showed him some pipes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31
is Melvin’s testimony that before they purchased their lot, the owner of lot nine showed him some pipes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mineral Point Valley Limited Partnership v. City of Mineral Point Board of Review
places him in a much better position to No. 03-1857(C) 3 evaluate the truthfulness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6665 - 2017-09-20
places him in a much better position to No. 03-1857(C) 3 evaluate the truthfulness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6665 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 165
in Borchardt—that awarding Borchardt his attorney fees in their entirety rewards him for losing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
in Borchardt—that awarding Borchardt his attorney fees in their entirety rewards him for losing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42630 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
only upon payment of the full purchase price. We cannot relieve him of the consequences of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536126 - 2022-06-29
only upon payment of the full purchase price. We cannot relieve him of the consequences of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536126 - 2022-06-29