Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49741 - 49750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49741 - 49750 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. Lee Raven
. at 676, 211 N.W.2d at 441. In this case, the complaint against Raven stated that by refusing to drop her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15650 - 2005-03-31
. at 676, 211 N.W.2d at 441. In this case, the complaint against Raven stated that by refusing to drop her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bill's Distributing, Ltd. v. Gerald Cormican
2002 WI App 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 156 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4413 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was on probation and that the experts in the case cited supervision as a factor relevant to the assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52368 - 2014-09-15
was on probation and that the experts in the case cited supervision as a factor relevant to the assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52368 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry M. Egleston
to make a prima facie case. However, the court concluded that the State proved by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
to make a prima facie case. However, the court concluded that the State proved by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Around 10:30 p.m. on January 28, 2010, the victim in this case awoke to two men with hoodies standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95802 - 2013-04-22
Around 10:30 p.m. on January 28, 2010, the victim in this case awoke to two men with hoodies standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95802 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
Town of Delafield v. Paul R. Sharpley, Sr.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2458 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11332 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2458 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11332 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 65
2020 WI APP 65 COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283181 - 2020-11-11
2020 WI APP 65 COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283181 - 2020-11-11
Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
. ¶15 Neither of these cases, nor any other we have been able to discover on post-judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
. ¶15 Neither of these cases, nor any other we have been able to discover on post-judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
John C. Hagen v. City of Milwaukee Employee's Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
the City. Hagen claims that, based on the supreme court’s holdings in the cases of Horrigan v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4639 - 2005-03-31
the City. Hagen claims that, based on the supreme court’s holdings in the cases of Horrigan v. State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4639 - 2005-03-31
State v. Virtis A.
the termination order. We affirm. ¶2 This case is governed by our standard of review. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
the termination order. We affirm. ¶2 This case is governed by our standard of review. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31