Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49741 - 49750 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49741 - 49750 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
State v. Mariontai Stacy
unconstitutional double jeopardy. While conceding that his double jeopardy argument contradicts current case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12567 - 2005-03-31
unconstitutional double jeopardy. While conceding that his double jeopardy argument contradicts current case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12567 - 2005-03-31
[MS WORD]
PR-1811: Inventory (Informal and Formal Administration)
2 Inventory Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY
/formdisplay/PR-1811.doc?formNumber=PR-1811&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-25
2 Inventory Page 3 of 2 Case No. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY
/formdisplay/PR-1811.doc?formNumber=PR-1811&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107201 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has determined that an appeal in White’s case would not be wholly frivolous.” Because a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121758 - 2014-09-15
has determined that an appeal in White’s case would not be wholly frivolous.” Because a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121758 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jose M. Aldazabal
was recharged after the first case was dismissed. In determining whether a double jeopardy violation occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
was recharged after the first case was dismissed. In determining whether a double jeopardy violation occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
�
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97121 - 2014-09-15
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97121 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Approval date: 09/12/2024 Page 1 of 2
an understanding of the conditions and the possible sanctions. This form allows the case worker to meet
/formdisplay/JD-1749_summary.pdf?formNumber=JD-1749&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-27
an understanding of the conditions and the possible sanctions. This form allows the case worker to meet
/formdisplay/JD-1749_summary.pdf?formNumber=JD-1749&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion to consolidate this appeal with Forbes’ no-merit appeals in his two related criminal cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993401 - 2025-08-07
motion to consolidate this appeal with Forbes’ no-merit appeals in his two related criminal cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993401 - 2025-08-07
February 1, 2000
Activities (Hold due to pending litigation, case no. 09-4080, Kingstad v. State Bar of Wisconsin (7th Circuit
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52888 - 2005-03-31
Activities (Hold due to pending litigation, case no. 09-4080, Kingstad v. State Bar of Wisconsin (7th Circuit
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52888 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kristopher P.
that the statute under which he was charged does not apply to him under the facts of his case. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15912 - 2005-03-31
that the statute under which he was charged does not apply to him under the facts of his case. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15912 - 2005-03-31