Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49761 - 49770 of 98593 for court records search online.
Search results 49761 - 49770 of 98593 for court records search online.
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
: COURT COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN Opinion Released: December 20, 1995 Opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
: COURT COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN Opinion Released: December 20, 1995 Opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
are brief but insightful. The trial court remarked: No. 2005AP2390-CR 6 On the records, files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21565 - 2017-09-21
are brief but insightful. The trial court remarked: No. 2005AP2390-CR 6 On the records, files
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 30, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35017 - 2014-09-15
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 30, 2008 David R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35017 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
. The trial court remarked: On the records, files, and proceedings, the statements of counsels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
. The trial court remarked: On the records, files, and proceedings, the statements of counsels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
discretion because (1) the record did not support the court’s rationale for the sentence imposed, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32710 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each of these regards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each of these regards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13895 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Strach v. Falls West Development Corporation
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 16, 1997 NOTICE A party may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10595 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED July 16, 1997 NOTICE A party may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10595 - 2017-09-20
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
. Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
. Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michele Kae Triebold v. Mark Edwin Triebold
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 1, 2005 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 1, 2005 Cornelia G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Trederick Nelson
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED OCTOBER 27, 1999 Marilyn L. Graves Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED OCTOBER 27, 1999 Marilyn L. Graves Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14804 - 2017-09-21