Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49781 - 49790 of 64561 for b's.
Search results 49781 - 49790 of 64561 for b's.
[PDF]
WI APP 52
)(b) & 939.50(3)(h). Douglas specifically acknowledged at the plea hearing that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94202 - 2014-09-15
)(b) & 939.50(3)(h). Douglas specifically acknowledged at the plea hearing that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.01(2)(b)3., (2)(d)2. The court ordered a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
. § 973.01(2)(b)3., (2)(d)2. The court ordered a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. b. However, the construction of the airstrip would still require 212,000 yards of earth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100145 - 2013-07-29
. b. However, the construction of the airstrip would still require 212,000 yards of earth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100145 - 2013-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., 390 Wis. 2d 50, ¶54. ¶32 D.K. was found to be dangerous under WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29
., 390 Wis. 2d 50, ¶54. ¶32 D.K. was found to be dangerous under WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
of the parties that the assets reflected on Exhibits A and B shall remain their own separate, respective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
of the parties that the assets reflected on Exhibits A and B shall remain their own separate, respective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20
State v. Peter J. Davies
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5737 - 2005-03-31
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark T. Smith
. No. 03-2616-CR 8 B. Expert Testimony ¶12 At trial, Smith proffered the testimony of Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-2616-CR 8 B. Expert Testimony ¶12 At trial, Smith proffered the testimony of Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6931 - 2017-09-20
Daniel Khalar v. James Murphy
] b. Discretionary Reversal under § 752.35, Stats. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
] b. Discretionary Reversal under § 752.35, Stats. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10161 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of keys in its closing argument did not prevent the real controversy from being fully tried.[6] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31634 - 2008-01-28
of keys in its closing argument did not prevent the real controversy from being fully tried.[6] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31634 - 2008-01-28
State v. Keith B. Kelly
. Keith B. Kelly, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31
. Keith B. Kelly, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2514 - 2005-03-31