Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4981 - 4990 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 4981 - 4990 of 83278 for case search.
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 59.34(1)(c) did not apply in this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6625 - 2017-09-19
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=174&year=2010
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=174&year=2010
State v. Roscoe Patterson
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roscoe Patterson
admitted that they were his and signed a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
admitted that they were his and signed a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Bunten
Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5527 - 2017-09-19
Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5527 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 37
the case to the state court for a determination of the search’s reasonableness. Id. ¶24 In Grady’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213507 - 2018-07-12
the case to the state court for a determination of the search’s reasonableness. Id. ¶24 In Grady’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213507 - 2018-07-12
[PDF]
who refuse a warrantless search, with no opportunity for precompliance review.” Count 1 of MBAW’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990239 - 2025-07-29
who refuse a warrantless search, with no opportunity for precompliance review.” Count 1 of MBAW’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990239 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Peter R. Cash
2004 WI App 63 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6596 - 2017-09-19
2004 WI App 63 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The charges against Cotton stem from a no-knock search warrant issued as part of a drug investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
The charges against Cotton stem from a no-knock search warrant issued as part of a drug investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
State v. Peter R. Cash
2004 WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6596 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 63 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1614-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6596 - 2005-03-31