Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49801 - 49810 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49801 - 49810 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
is dispositive in this case. See State v. Eichman, 155 Wis.2d 552, 560, 456 N.W.2d 143, 146 (1990). Section 6.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
is dispositive in this case. See State v. Eichman, 155 Wis.2d 552, 560, 456 N.W.2d 143, 146 (1990). Section 6.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13171 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Weichman in an earlier case, Milwaukee County 10-SC-022584, and that eviction action was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06
Weichman in an earlier case, Milwaukee County 10-SC-022584, and that eviction action was dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
). After disagreeing with appointed counsel’s assessment of his case, McPhetridge insisted on proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26823 - 2006-10-16
). After disagreeing with appointed counsel’s assessment of his case, McPhetridge insisted on proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26823 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
sentences commuted pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (“In any case where the court imposes a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25613 - 2017-09-21
sentences commuted pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (“In any case where the court imposes a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25613 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case was pending, the circuit court twice granted Chambers’s requests to have new trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267308 - 2020-07-07
the case was pending, the circuit court twice granted Chambers’s requests to have new trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267308 - 2020-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[CUMIS] or [IRA] as [CUMIS]’s representative in a collection case, [IRA] would request that [CUMIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163873 - 2017-09-21
[CUMIS] or [IRA] as [CUMIS]’s representative in a collection case, [IRA] would request that [CUMIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court took judicial notice of the orders in the underling CHIPS cases. In addition, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246985 - 2019-09-16
that the circuit court took judicial notice of the orders in the underling CHIPS cases. In addition, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246985 - 2019-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
court accepted the plea and stated: “I guess we don’t have a DNA order since it is a 1999 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28565 - 2007-03-26
court accepted the plea and stated: “I guess we don’t have a DNA order since it is a 1999 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28565 - 2007-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
Dane County must pay in either case because Nancy is indigent. We disagree, and therefore affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29292 - 2007-06-06
Dane County must pay in either case because Nancy is indigent. We disagree, and therefore affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29292 - 2007-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244330 - 2019-08-30
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244330 - 2019-08-30