Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49821 - 49830 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 49821 - 49830 of 83455 for simple case search.
State v. Craig A. Felten
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3918 - 2005-03-31
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3918 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
in this case. See State v. Arredondo, 2004 WI App 7, ¶40, 269 Wis. 2d 369, 674 N.W.2d 647 (to show counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
in this case. See State v. Arredondo, 2004 WI App 7, ¶40, 269 Wis. 2d 369, 674 N.W.2d 647 (to show counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Gary A. McCaughtry
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026288 - 2025-10-22
State v. John R. Brunette
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11277 - 2011-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2351
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11277 - 2011-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
343, 425 N.W.2d 649 (Ct. App. 1988). That case does not support either proposition. In Ambuehl, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37750 - 2009-07-15
343, 425 N.W.2d 649 (Ct. App. 1988). That case does not support either proposition. In Ambuehl, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37750 - 2009-07-15
State v. Craig A. Felten
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2005-03-31
him on probation in both cases. His probation was subsequently revoked and Felten returned to court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3917 - 2005-03-31
Tony Chaney v. Jeffery Endicott
to dismissal for the reasons they put forth. In summary judgment cases, we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10927 - 2005-03-31
to dismissal for the reasons they put forth. In summary judgment cases, we apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10927 - 2005-03-31
Susan Shoemaker v. KraftMaid Cabinetry, Inc.
of Shoemaker’s case, KraftMaid made a motion to dismiss. The court granted that motion on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3510 - 2005-03-31
of Shoemaker’s case, KraftMaid made a motion to dismiss. The court granted that motion on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3510 - 2005-03-31