Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49821 - 49830 of 83455 for simple case search.

CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102012 - 2013-09-12

City of Elkhorn v. Jane St. John
The facts and history of this case are undisputed. After being charged with her first offense OWI, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6174 - 2010-07-26

CA Blank Order
. The trial court considered the standard sentencing factors and explained their application to these cases
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101834 - 2013-09-08

William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
2001 WI 19 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-2446 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17550 - 2006-12-18

In the Matter of Wis. Stats. 758.18, 807.001, and 971.025; Creation of SCR 70.153 - Creation and Use of Forms in the Circuit Court
specified that a party's failure to use a mandatory form would not constitute cause to dismiss a case
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1004 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92104 - 2005-01-23

COURT OF APPEALS
agree, as did the trial court. The trial court concluded, “This is not a bad anonymous tip case. It’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32140 - 2008-03-18

State v. Thomas P. Connelly
as the letter of the agreement. The State argues that this case is controlled by this court’s decision in State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12969 - 2005-03-31

State v. William Wilson Gordon
was erroneously not given the opportunity to hear important testimony that bore on an important issue in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12843 - 2005-03-31

Susan Shoemaker v. KraftMaid Cabinetry, Inc.
of Shoemaker’s case, KraftMaid made a motion to dismiss. The court granted that motion on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3510 - 2005-03-31