Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49831 - 49840 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49831 - 49840 of 74849 for public records.
State v. James J. Kempinski
and that the record does not reveal strong proof of guilt. An Alford plea is a conditional guilty plea in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2011-10-31
and that the record does not reveal strong proof of guilt. An Alford plea is a conditional guilty plea in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2011-10-31
State v. Eugene E. Volk
the prisoner’s status there. We find no support either in the record or the law for Volk’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
the prisoner’s status there. We find no support either in the record or the law for Volk’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the factual assertions by Joiner that were not supported by the record. LIRC acknowledged Joiner’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98714 - 2014-09-15
the factual assertions by Joiner that were not supported by the record. LIRC acknowledged Joiner’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98714 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27843 - 2014-09-15
sufficient to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Margo Bennett v. Piccadilly Apartments
-1034-FT -3- October 10, 1991, and Bennett alleged that Dr. Stewart's records showed that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8914 - 2017-09-19
-1034-FT -3- October 10, 1991, and Bennett alleged that Dr. Stewart's records showed that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8914 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Ambrose’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Ambrose’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Ambrose’s response, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Ambrose’s response, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771424 - 2024-03-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of his guardianship and protective placement. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
of his guardianship and protective placement. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069548 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 filed a response. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095093 - 2026-03-24
2 filed a response. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095093 - 2026-03-24
State v. Eugene E. Volk
the prisoner’s status there. We find no support either in the record or the law for Volk’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
the prisoner’s status there. We find no support either in the record or the law for Volk’s assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31