Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49851 - 49860 of 82610 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49851 - 49860 of 82610 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in that case and in the civil case was that he acted in self-defense. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
in that case and in the civil case was that he acted in self-defense. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient opportunity to thoroughly discuss the case, the plea agreement, and the plea … with [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65782 - 2014-09-15
a sufficient opportunity to thoroughly discuss the case, the plea agreement, and the plea … with [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2008-12-29
) (citation omitted). As we did in Hatch, we will address the claimed error in this case. ¶8 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35058 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
addressed and rejected substantially the same issue as presented in this case. Although I am not bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
addressed and rejected substantially the same issue as presented in this case. Although I am not bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192011 - 2017-09-21
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
. § 346.34. He suggests this case is resolved by statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
. § 346.34. He suggests this case is resolved by statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
CA Blank Order
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2005-04-28
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2005-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
moves for dismissal based on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
moves for dismissal based on a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution’s case and the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31258 - 2007-12-19
[PDF]
WI 71
2011 WI 71 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2009AP775 COMPLETE TITLE: E-Z Roll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67854 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI 71 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2009AP775 COMPLETE TITLE: E-Z Roll
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67854 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
2011 WI 71 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP775 Complete Title: E-Z Roll Off
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67854 - 2011-07-31
2011 WI 71 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2009AP775 Complete Title: E-Z Roll Off
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67854 - 2011-07-31