Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49851 - 49860 of 55743 for n y c.
Search results 49851 - 49860 of 55743 for n y c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and not subject to disclosure. This court again disagrees. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.04(4)(c), those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539161 - 2022-07-06
and not subject to disclosure. This court again disagrees. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 905.04(4)(c), those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539161 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133579 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2011-12). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. TERRENCE C. STOKES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. TERRENCE C. STOKES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
to random urinalysis; (c) surrender his passport; (d) have no contact with named victims; (e) refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
to random urinalysis; (c) surrender his passport; (d) have no contact with named victims; (e) refrain from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
was based on “[c]onsideration of the evidence presented on the criteria listed in Wisconsin Statutes 48.18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
was based on “[c]onsideration of the evidence presented on the criteria listed in Wisconsin Statutes 48.18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the particular case. Compare WIS. STAT. § 938.34(15m)(am) and (c) to § 938.34(15m)(bm) and WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
to the particular case. Compare WIS. STAT. § 938.34(15m)(am) and (c) to § 938.34(15m)(bm) and WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Mark A. Feiler
. DYKMAN, P.J. This is a single-judge appeal decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. Mark A. Feiler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10746 - 2017-09-20
. DYKMAN, P.J. This is a single-judge appeal decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. Mark A. Feiler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10746 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Racicot
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 97-1047 2 the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12337 - 2017-09-21
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 97-1047 2 the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12337 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randall M. Miller
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). Additionally, all further references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). Additionally, all further references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21