Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49881 - 49890 of 82997 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
, not counsel; a mental disease or defect plea was a reasonable option in this case; counsel did not inform Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70955 - 2011-09-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[CUMIS] or [IRA] as [CUMIS]’s representative in a collection case, [IRA] would request that [CUMIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163873 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101244 - 2013-08-27

CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97925 - 2013-06-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181210 - 2017-09-21

State v. Spriggie Hensley, Jr.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3052
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13158 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court dismissed it at the close of the State’s case at trial. We remand the matter to the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103604 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marvin Jost
that a second trial be held. ¶3 Jost subsequently moved the court to dismiss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6487 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
the individual’s right to be free from government interference. Id. In this case, Berenz does not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29049 - 2014-09-15