Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49881 - 49890 of 51735 for him.

State v. Carla L. Oglesby
revocation, and the trial court sentenced him to a county jail sentence. Lipke, 186 Wis. 2d at 362. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24803 - 2006-05-30

WI App 148 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP225 Complete Title of...
was a sexually violent person. The circuit court ordered him placed in the custody of the Department of Health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104462 - 2013-12-17

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
to subject him to suit in his own courts.” Michael J. Waldspurger, Comment, Ameliorating the Harsh Effects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7842 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
him regarding the drive-bys, Tamms’ trial counsel made the following objection: I’m going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46286 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 97
testify against him or her at the trial. Ritchie, 480 U.S. at 51. It follows that in pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99340 - 2017-09-21

State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
were causing him “problems at work.” As a result, he said that he “had a much greater heightened sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James Lalor
to distinguish the dangerous sexual offender whose serious mental illness, abnormality or disorder subjects him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2830 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Robert J. Nehm v. State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture
that he was unable to state an opinion as to the soundness of the system. Nehm told him that a design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10939 - 2017-09-20

Frontsheet
in the amount of $3,363.39 to Thiede for the balance of the proceeds due him. On April 22, 2002, Attorney Smith
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32206 - 2008-03-20

[PDF] WI APP 25
and adjudicated him guilty. As a penalty, the court imposed “a forfeiture plus costs” totaling $200.50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77018 - 2014-09-15