Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49891 - 49900 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49891 - 49900 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Allen L.
that the statute applies under the facts of this case. Rather, by its very terms, the statute applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2776 - 2017-09-19
that the statute applies under the facts of this case. Rather, by its very terms, the statute applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2776 - 2017-09-19
Gordon D. Nelson v. Haus, Roman & Banks, LLP
was filed after the statute of limitations had expired, so the case was dismissed with prejudice. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26535 - 2006-09-20
was filed after the statute of limitations had expired, so the case was dismissed with prejudice. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26535 - 2006-09-20
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
not established that his counsel’s performance was deficient. Young-Cooper relies on the case of State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3683 - 2005-03-31
not established that his counsel’s performance was deficient. Young-Cooper relies on the case of State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3683 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in that case and in the civil case was that he acted in self-defense. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
in that case and in the civil case was that he acted in self-defense. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
change. Based upon our review of his brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
change. Based upon our review of his brief and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237565 - 2019-03-20
COURT OF APPEALS
upon which to order the extension of her mental health commitment because Kathleen’s case manager
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60234 - 2011-02-22
upon which to order the extension of her mental health commitment because Kathleen’s case manager
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60234 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
Ruth A. Ruege v. Thomas J. Dougherty, M.D.
consent claim. The case eventually went to the jury on the issue of negligence. The jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2932 - 2017-09-19
consent claim. The case eventually went to the jury on the issue of negligence. The jury returned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2932 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Casualty Insurance Company (Continental), in his suit seeking damages for a variety of claims. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27041 - 2006-11-06
Casualty Insurance Company (Continental), in his suit seeking damages for a variety of claims. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27041 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989750 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171126 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171126 - 2017-09-21