Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4991 - 5000 of 74480 for public records.
Search results 4991 - 5000 of 74480 for public records.
State v. Crystal C. Parker
of deterrence. Because the record reveals that the trial court engaged in proper sentencing rationale, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2005-03-31
of deterrence. Because the record reveals that the trial court engaged in proper sentencing rationale, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5471 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 34
a public reprimand, together with restitution and costs. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49950 - 2014-09-15
a public reprimand, together with restitution and costs. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49950 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” the court “shall … refer the movant to the state public defender for determination of indigency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88856 - 2014-09-15
,” the court “shall … refer the movant to the state public defender for determination of indigency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88856 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry M. Egleston
points to the record of the 1998 plea hearing where the court does not directly address Egleston’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
points to the record of the 1998 plea hearing where the court does not directly address Egleston’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
Masterjohn. We agree. However, because the Board made an inadequate record of the facts and reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31932 - 2014-09-15
Masterjohn. We agree. However, because the Board made an inadequate record of the facts and reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31932 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 69
), where the public is given access to property for recreational use, “no owner and no officer, employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223671 - 2018-12-06
), where the public is given access to property for recreational use, “no owner and no officer, employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223671 - 2018-12-06
[PDF]
WI 72
-appellant-petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51868 - 2014-09-15
-appellant-petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51868 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
there were briefs and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51868 - 2010-07-07
there were briefs and oral argument by Ellen Henak, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51868 - 2010-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11
] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31786 - 2008-02-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
/000021.html). A 1995 public reprimand for failure to promptly provide his client in a personal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342081 - 2021-03-03
/000021.html). A 1995 public reprimand for failure to promptly provide his client in a personal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342081 - 2021-03-03