Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49921 - 49930 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49921 - 49930 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
was sentenced as a repeat offender based on his prior misdemeanor convictions in Dane County case no. 1996CF2331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26594 - 2006-09-27
was sentenced as a repeat offender based on his prior misdemeanor convictions in Dane County case no. 1996CF2331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26594 - 2006-09-27
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
not intend to submit a brief in this case. I do not quite understand why a concession of error is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5910 - 2005-03-31
not intend to submit a brief in this case. I do not quite understand why a concession of error is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407375 - 2021-08-10
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407375 - 2021-08-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal is whether the two cases were properly joined for trial. We conclude that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206155 - 2017-12-28
on appeal is whether the two cases were properly joined for trial. We conclude that they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206155 - 2017-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recovery for negligence based upon the specific facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82635 - 2014-09-15
recovery for negligence based upon the specific facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 According
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82635 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30027 - 2014-09-15
-interests hearing, as did social-service workers assigned to Rodney’s case, Jane Doe, and, as noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30027 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, and Cleaves submitted three responses. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
of the report, and Cleaves submitted three responses. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257467 - 2020-04-16
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-08
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Raymond Johnson
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12966 - 2017-09-21
establish the basis for the search in this case. Johnson maintains, however, that the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12966 - 2017-09-21