Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49931 - 49940 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 49931 - 49940 of 74849 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record, or even a description of the potential evidence. Whittenberger complains that his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579883 - 2022-10-20
to the record, or even a description of the potential evidence. Whittenberger complains that his defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=579883 - 2022-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268986 - 2020-07-14
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268986 - 2020-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s orders were supported by its findings of fact and the record as a whole. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125162 - 2014-10-28
court’s orders were supported by its findings of fact and the record as a whole. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125162 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
State v. James I. Montroy
and eight juvenile adjudications, in light of Montroy’s extensive adult record, was not significant enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
and eight juvenile adjudications, in light of Montroy’s extensive adult record, was not significant enough
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19432 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
,” reviewed his records, conversed with him, and did a mental status evaluation of him between the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10
,” reviewed his records, conversed with him, and did a mental status evaluation of him between the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the motion based on briefing from the parties, and on the record, which includes five documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174915 - 2017-09-21
the motion based on briefing from the parties, and on the record, which includes five documents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174915 - 2017-09-21
Racine County Department of Human Services v. Kamilla F.
disposition, including expert testimony. See Wis. Stat. § 48.427(1). The record, however, relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
disposition, including expert testimony. See Wis. Stat. § 48.427(1). The record, however, relates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was also informed “that any records relating to the citation … had likely been destroyed pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610563 - 2023-01-18
was also informed “that any records relating to the citation … had likely been destroyed pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610563 - 2023-01-18