Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49941 - 49950 of 68326 for did.
Search results 49941 - 49950 of 68326 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Lance L. Reed
to an alternative test via the Informing the Accused form and did not request such a test. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5184 - 2017-09-19
to an alternative test via the Informing the Accused form and did not request such a test. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5184 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision in his direct appeal. Leventhal did not appeal that court order. In September 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901417 - 2025-01-15
decision in his direct appeal. Leventhal did not appeal that court order. In September 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901417 - 2025-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Jenkins did not respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191678 - 2017-09-21
. Jenkins did not respond. After independently reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191678 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” They would make her sit alone in her room or on a chair all day, they took away her toys, and she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191613 - 2017-09-21
.” They would make her sit alone in her room or on a chair all day, they took away her toys, and she did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191613 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
detention and arrest on the basis that Stelter did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58159 - 2010-12-22
detention and arrest on the basis that Stelter did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58159 - 2010-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
destroyed the property, but then admits that he did not file his notice of claim until after filing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58796 - 2011-01-10
destroyed the property, but then admits that he did not file his notice of claim until after filing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58796 - 2011-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, indicating he did not consent to counsel closing the file and wished to proceed pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
, indicating he did not consent to counsel closing the file and wished to proceed pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop to request field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
argues the deputy did not have reasonable suspicion to extend the traffic stop to request field
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the sale of the Precision stock did not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the sale of the Precision stock did not produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33809 - 2008-08-26
CA Blank Order
by the State and the court did not even invoke the enhancer for habitual criminality. See State v. Grindemann
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94034 - 2013-03-10
by the State and the court did not even invoke the enhancer for habitual criminality. See State v. Grindemann
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94034 - 2013-03-10