Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49951 - 49960 of 59098 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
applies at the dispositional hearing. See id., ¶44. She claims the circuit court in her case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842965 - 2024-08-28

State v. Jonathan J. English-Lancaster
At the postconviction hearing, English-Lancaster claimed that he did not understand that he could still accept the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4023 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Philip Arreola v. State
to McCann McCann claims that he was entitled to notice of the hearing on Dodge County's petition under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8737 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
incarcerated for periods of time before the initiation of the CHIPS proceeding, he does not claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858175 - 2024-10-09

[PDF] State v. James L. Larson
Additionally, as reasoned in Welsh, the claim of “hot pursuit” is unconvincing because there was no immediate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5822 - 2017-09-19

Al-Furqaan Fussilat v. Gary R. Mccaughtry
informants who claimed to be eye witnesses to an assault by inmate Rowell on inmate Gates. The two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8616 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
often return the children earlier than expected, claiming she could not handle them. While Hatala did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4056 - 2017-09-20

State v. Marvin L. Hereford
facts sufficient to demonstrate either deficient performance or prejudice for his first two claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13971 - 2005-03-31

Philip Arreola v. State
denied both motions. I. Notice to McCann McCann claims that he was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8737 - 2005-03-31

Beverly Hayen v. Barry Hayen
). ¶16 Like his equal protection claim, Barry’s substantive due process claim is without merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15558 - 2005-03-31