Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49961 - 49970 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49961 - 49970 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
CA Blank Order
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
Leo Dunlap v. City of Kenosha
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case or reasonable prospect for success on the merits. Based upon the record before the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28
the case or reasonable prospect for success on the merits. Based upon the record before the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
State v. Romaine A. Langham
2006 WI APP 149 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2164-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 149 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2164-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2023 WI 14 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP1221-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627151 - 2023-02-24
2023 WI 14 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2022AP1221-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=627151 - 2023-02-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
is particularly problematic because he simply ignores recent, critical case law on this issue. In State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47128 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in the community, and failing to consider the complexity of the case because it involved tribal law as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
in the community, and failing to consider the complexity of the case because it involved tribal law as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29791 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case. 1 Rather, he suggests that it is inconsistent with the court’s earlier observation that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226919 - 2018-11-14
in this case. 1 Rather, he suggests that it is inconsistent with the court’s earlier observation that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226919 - 2018-11-14