Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 49981 - 49990 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 49981 - 49990 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
cases.[4] [Footnote added.] ¶7 The issue of the jurisdiction of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24
cases.[4] [Footnote added.] ¶7 The issue of the jurisdiction of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48251 - 2010-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
before in this case.[1] The motion that Dean filed on September 30, 2009, specifically relied on Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08
before in this case.[1] The motion that Dean filed on September 30, 2009, specifically relied on Cherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121253 - 2014-09-08
James Robleski v. C.R. Meyer and Sons Company
’ policy; and (2) Did Utica’s conduct during this case, including decisions made by the attorney it hired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14182 - 2005-03-31
’ policy; and (2) Did Utica’s conduct during this case, including decisions made by the attorney it hired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14182 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
case. He also was ordered to pay a fine of $550 and to submit a DNA sample and pay the $250 testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
a brief in this case. I do No. 02-3113 4 not quite understand why a concession of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5910 - 2017-09-19
a brief in this case. I do No. 02-3113 4 not quite understand why a concession of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5910 - 2017-09-19
Leo Dunlap v. City of Kenosha
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11
. App. 1988). The question in this case is whether the concrete walkway constitutes a sidewalk under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19871 - 2005-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
, 314 N.W.2d 911 (Ct. App. 1981), where we held that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7454 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the case or reasonable prospect for success on the merits. Based upon the record before the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28
the case or reasonable prospect for success on the merits. Based upon the record before the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258847 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191388 - 2017-09-21
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. This case arises from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
or retained is irrelevant: under the applicable law Dane County must pay in either case because Nancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29292 - 2014-09-15
or retained is irrelevant: under the applicable law Dane County must pay in either case because Nancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29292 - 2014-09-15