Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51 - 60 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 51 - 60 of 63679 for Motion for joint custody.
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
the father's motion under § 767.325(1)(b), Stats.,[1] to transfer legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8371 - 2005-03-31
the father's motion under § 767.325(1)(b), Stats.,[1] to transfer legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
or judgment on the father's motion because mediation was not completed or terminated. MEDIATION AND JOINT
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8371 - 2017-09-19
or judgment on the father's motion because mediation was not completed or terminated. MEDIATION AND JOINT
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8371 - 2017-09-19
[MS WORD]
FA-614: Order Relating to Paternity/Legal Custody/Physical Placement/Visitation/Child Support
children: |_| 1) Joint legal custody with both parents. |_| 2) Sole legal custody
/formdisplay/FA-614.doc?formNumber=FA-614&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-07-14
children: |_| 1) Joint legal custody with both parents. |_| 2) Sole legal custody
/formdisplay/FA-614.doc?formNumber=FA-614&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2022-07-14
Kathleen M. Donohoe v. Steven J. Klebar
) the evidence rebutted the presumption for joint custody and shared placement; and (3) the children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5025 - 2005-03-31
) the evidence rebutted the presumption for joint custody and shared placement; and (3) the children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kathleen M. Donohoe v. Steven J. Klebar
rebutted the presumption for joint custody and shared placement; and (3) the children were not capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5025 - 2017-09-19
rebutted the presumption for joint custody and shared placement; and (3) the children were not capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5025 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement (MSA). The MSA provided the parties with joint legal custody of the children. In addition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
agreement (MSA). The MSA provided the parties with joint legal custody of the children. In addition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173804 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Krueger’s request for joint custody; and granting of Krueger’s request for partial placement. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482816 - 2022-02-15
of Krueger’s request for joint custody; and granting of Krueger’s request for partial placement. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482816 - 2022-02-15