Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51 - 60 of 12554 for abuse.
Search results 51 - 60 of 12554 for abuse.
COURT OF APPEALS
of domestic abuse, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 947.01(1) and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12).[2] He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
of domestic abuse, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 947.01(1) and 968.075(1)(a) (2011-12).[2] He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of disorderly conduct, as an act of domestic abuse, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107713 - 2017-09-21
convicting him of disorderly conduct, as an act of domestic abuse, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107713 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
describes count 1 as “[WIS. STAT. §] 973.055(1)2 Domestic Abuse Assessments]”3 and as “Battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249713 - 2019-11-07
describes count 1 as “[WIS. STAT. §] 973.055(1)2 Domestic Abuse Assessments]”3 and as “Battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249713 - 2019-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
entered after he pled guilty to three counts of violating a domestic abuse temporary restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28
entered after he pled guilty to three counts of violating a domestic abuse temporary restraining order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125279 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Martin Kennedy appeals the judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct (domestic abuse assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
Martin Kennedy appeals the judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct (domestic abuse assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21
Lori B. v. Steven B.
that the court erred by modifying the standard TPR instruction for child abuse and that the court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
that the court erred by modifying the standard TPR instruction for child abuse and that the court incorrectly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14663 - 2005-03-31
Taylor County v. Mary Z.
by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s department of human services was in 1984 regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7663 - 2005-03-31
by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s department of human services was in 1984 regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7663 - 2005-03-31
Taylor County v. Mary Z.
by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s department of human services was in 1984 regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7662 - 2005-03-31
by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s department of human services was in 1984 regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of child abuse to find that B.S.-S. was unfit. B.S.-S. argues that the circuit court was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
of child abuse to find that B.S.-S. was unfit. B.S.-S. argues that the circuit court was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Taylor County v. Mary Z.
themselves and toward their children, exacerbated by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7663 - 2017-09-19
themselves and toward their children, exacerbated by alcohol abuse. Their first contact with the County’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7663 - 2017-09-19