Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51 - 60 of 201 for hy's.
Search results 51 - 60 of 201 for hy's.
[PDF]
P
R S ta te v . T im ot hy J . L il le y 03 -2 6- 20 08 A ff ir m ed 20 07 A P
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32699 - 2014-09-15
R S ta te v . T im ot hy J . L il le y 03 -2 6- 20 08 A ff ir m ed 20 07 A P
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32699 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 90
2019AP1433 Kimberly C. Niemi v. Martin B. Hying 08/11/2021 2019AP1451-CR State v. Daryl J. Strenke 08/11
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597230 - 2022-12-01
2019AP1433 Kimberly C. Niemi v. Martin B. Hying 08/11/2021 2019AP1451-CR State v. Daryl J. Strenke 08/11
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597230 - 2022-12-01
[PDF]
Disposition table - August 2021
2019AP1433 Kimberly C. Niemi v. Martin B. Hying 08/11/2021 2019AP1451-CR State v. Daryl J. Strenke 08/11
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597230 - 2022-12-01
2019AP1433 Kimberly C. Niemi v. Martin B. Hying 08/11/2021 2019AP1451-CR State v. Daryl J. Strenke 08/11
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597230 - 2022-12-01
Wisconsin Court System - Court of Appeals opinion search results
Martin Hying v. Dennis Flynn 2 Racine PDF Jan 28, 2026 2024AP002077 Racine County HSD v. K. M. 2 Racine
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=01/28/2026&end_date=01/28/2026¬iceTypeCode=SMD
Martin Hying v. Dennis Flynn 2 Racine PDF Jan 28, 2026 2024AP002077 Racine County HSD v. K. M. 2 Racine
/other/appeals/caopin.jsp?SortBy=date&begin_date=01/28/2026&end_date=01/28/2026¬iceTypeCode=SMD
State v. Antonio M. Settles
?” and “[W]hy was Willie Jean Winters not called to testify by either side?” The court stated that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3067 - 2005-03-31
?” and “[W]hy was Willie Jean Winters not called to testify by either side?” The court stated that counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3067 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
unless otherwise noted. [2] When next asked, “[W]hy not?” the SANE explained, “[B]ecause with consensual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
unless otherwise noted. [2] When next asked, “[W]hy not?” the SANE explained, “[B]ecause with consensual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105214 - 2013-12-10
[PDF]
P
ot hy M ar k M aj ew sk i 08 -3 0- 20 11 A ff ir m ed 20 10 A P 00 15 44 C R
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72223 - 2014-09-15
ot hy M ar k M aj ew sk i 08 -3 0- 20 11 A ff ir m ed 20 10 A P 00 15 44 C R
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72223 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
some steps, then threw up his hands and said, “[W]hy am I even doing this[?] I wasn’t driving.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
some steps, then threw up his hands and said, “[W]hy am I even doing this[?] I wasn’t driving.” He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
recommended six months in jail concurrent to his prison sentence. The circuit court asked, “[W]hy are we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
recommended six months in jail concurrent to his prison sentence. The circuit court asked, “[W]hy are we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing statement substantially took the following form: “‘[W]hy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419109 - 2021-08-31
reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing statement substantially took the following form: “‘[W]hy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=419109 - 2021-08-31