Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 51 - 60 of 408 for ut.
Search results 51 - 60 of 408 for ut.
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
. Whether the change is substantial is a question of law that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a substantial change of circumstances. The court also stated: [B]ut then we found out that Mrs. Verhein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15
a substantial change of circumstances. The court also stated: [B]ut then we found out that Mrs. Verhein
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76882 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo, “[b]ut, because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2808 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a substantial change of circumstances. The court also stated: [B]ut then we found out that Mrs. Verhein also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2013-06-18
a substantial change of circumstances. The court also stated: [B]ut then we found out that Mrs. Verhein also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2013-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had the gun …. THE COURT: … [B]ut you’re telling me that you didn’t possess the gun itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
had the gun …. THE COURT: … [B]ut you’re telling me that you didn’t possess the gun itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of this possible consequence, and that “[b]ut
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162833 - 2017-09-21
ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of this possible consequence, and that “[b]ut
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162833 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
probably be—probably be an inappropriate touch…[b]ut [he] really didn’t know back then what it meant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91455 - 2014-09-15
probably be—probably be an inappropriate touch…[b]ut [he] really didn’t know back then what it meant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
P
P E A L S T A B L E O F U N P U B L IS H E D O P IN IO N S A ut ho re d
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82212 - 2014-09-15
P E A L S T A B L E O F U N P U B L IS H E D O P IN IO N S A ut ho re d
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82212 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it did not consider probation at the sentencing hearing: [B]ut because the recommendation was a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
that it did not consider probation at the sentencing hearing: [B]ut because the recommendation was a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193093 - 2017-09-21
State v. Auston J.S.
]ut it’s not solely a situation where because these are misdemeanors that that in and of itself cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31
]ut it’s not solely a situation where because these are misdemeanors that that in and of itself cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7665 - 2005-03-31