Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 82311 for case status.
Search results 501 - 510 of 82311 for case status.
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
status and learned that Howk was revoked. At this time, Kreft also knew Howk had been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6972 - 2005-03-31
status and learned that Howk was revoked. At this time, Kreft also knew Howk had been revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
Although Judge John R. Race entered the judgment in this case, Judge Robert J. Kennedy issued the ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6972 - 2017-09-20
Although Judge John R. Race entered the judgment in this case, Judge Robert J. Kennedy issued the ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6972 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
David W. Ames v. George R. Atkinson
his motion at a hearing noticed as a “status conference.” We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24895 - 2017-09-21
his motion at a hearing noticed as a “status conference.” We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24895 - 2017-09-21
David W. Ames v. George R. Atkinson
process when the circuit court decided his motion at a hearing noticed as a “status conference.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24895 - 2006-04-25
process when the circuit court decided his motion at a hearing noticed as a “status conference.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24895 - 2006-04-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
retirement status” No. 2008AP1770 2 was ambiguous. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43059 - 2014-09-15
retirement status” No. 2008AP1770 2 was ambiguous. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43059 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that, as used in the Agreement, the phrase “entering retirement status” was ambiguous. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43059 - 2011-05-23
determined that, as used in the Agreement, the phrase “entering retirement status” was ambiguous. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43059 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s revised opinion was based upon the Old Chief line of cases, which hold that a court can direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
counsel’s revised opinion was based upon the Old Chief line of cases, which hold that a court can direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216042 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2017 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1292-CR and 2015AP1293-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191653 - 2017-09-21
2017 WI 59 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2015AP1292-CR and 2015AP1293-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191653 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Ware
as to the definition of actual custody. We conclude that because Ware was under lawful arrest his status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14904 - 2017-09-21
as to the definition of actual custody. We conclude that because Ware was under lawful arrest his status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert L. Sherry
2003 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0263-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16718 - 2017-09-21
2003 WI 123 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0263-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16718 - 2017-09-21