Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 2567 for dnr.
Search results 501 - 510 of 2567 for dnr.
County of Sawyer Zoning Board v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development
zoning ordinance must meet reasonable minimum standards or the DNR may adopt an ordinance for the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15262 - 2005-03-31
zoning ordinance must meet reasonable minimum standards or the DNR may adopt an ordinance for the county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Louis Kapischke v. County of Walworth
of claim with an officer of the municipality before filing suit. See DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
of claim with an officer of the municipality before filing suit. See DNR v. City of Waukesha, 184 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Sawyer Zoning Board v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development
standards or the DNR may adopt an ordinance for the county. See § 59.692(6), STATS.; WIS. ADM. CODE § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15262 - 2017-09-21
standards or the DNR may adopt an ordinance for the county. See § 59.692(6), STATS.; WIS. ADM. CODE § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl Scott Hitchcock
Hansis, a DNR employee, testified that on March 24, 1993, in a telephone conversation with Hitchcock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9512 - 2017-09-19
Hansis, a DNR employee, testified that on March 24, 1993, in a telephone conversation with Hitchcock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. City of Oak Creek
. ¶3 However, Oak Creek did not notify, or request a permit from, the DNR before the channel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17290 - 2017-09-21
. ¶3 However, Oak Creek did not notify, or request a permit from, the DNR before the channel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17290 - 2017-09-21
State v. City of Oak Creek
, or request a permit from, the DNR before the channel was built. The DNR had previously warned Oak Creek
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17290 - 2005-03-31
, or request a permit from, the DNR before the channel was built. The DNR had previously warned Oak Creek
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17290 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
control plan, as required by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), for the property upon which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65333 - 2011-06-06
control plan, as required by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), for the property upon which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65333 - 2011-06-06
April 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
Design Services v. DNR 03-02-2006 Affirmed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25115 - 2006-05-08
Design Services v. DNR 03-02-2006 Affirmed
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25115 - 2006-05-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of Natural Resources (DNR) permit for its pier and therefore cannot be subject to a 100-foot limit. The DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24
of Natural Resources (DNR) permit for its pier and therefore cannot be subject to a 100-foot limit. The DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2012-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a site erosion control plan, as required by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), for the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65333 - 2014-09-15
a site erosion control plan, as required by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), for the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65333 - 2014-09-15