Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 59340 for quit claim deed.

COURT OF APPEALS
trial ordering reformation of the deed to a 1988 real estate transaction between Development Associates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36692 - 2009-06-03

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
mortgage and in the sheriff’s deed to include all of the West Allis property in dispute, including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95945 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jennifer Lynn Schaefer v. Anthony Wade Schaefer
residence and title shall be transferred to [Anthony] by quit claim deed from [Jennifer]. Pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6747 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI 5
case. After finding that the actual boundary line4 could not be determined from the deed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59682 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
in the present case. After finding that the actual boundary line[4] could not be determined from the deed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59682 - 2011-02-02

WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2119 Complete Title of...
in the Kenosha County Register of Deeds in 1945, which allows the owners of one property, and their customers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114760 - 2012-09-20

[PDF] Daniel Sagert v. Waukesha County Treasurer
of the register of deeds for Sagert’s address, his claim that knowledge of his incarceration in the Huber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25151 - 2017-09-21

Daniel Sagert v. Waukesha County Treasurer
was statutorily entitled to rely on the records of the register of deeds for Sagert’s address, his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25151 - 2006-05-16

Jerry K. Saeger v. David E. Lundgren
conclude that the deeds are unambiguous, the trial court could not consider extrinsic evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11556 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jerry K. Saeger v. David E. Lundgren
court erred by failing to determine the grantor's intent. Because we conclude that the deeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11556 - 2017-09-19