Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 501 - 510 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
must “be brought to trial within 180 days.” Id. This speedy trial request must be accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
must “be brought to trial within 180 days.” Id. This speedy trial request must be accompanied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197970 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial. Under both the state and federal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176951 - 2017-09-21
his constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial. Under both the state and federal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brook Grzelak
. 1 The trial court also found that Grzelak waived his right to a speedy disposition when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The trial court also found that Grzelak waived his right to a speedy disposition when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brook Grzelak
observations that the term “trial” in the Sixth Amendment speedy trial clause of the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
observations that the term “trial” in the Sixth Amendment speedy trial clause of the United States Constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(with some exceptions not relevant here), we need not consider whether there was a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
(with some exceptions not relevant here), we need not consider whether there was a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(with some exceptions not relevant here), we need not consider whether there was a speedy trial violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
(with some exceptions not relevant here), we need not consider whether there was a speedy trial violation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758136 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on December 24, 2017, pursuant to the IAD. Taylor requested a speedy trial and a jury trial was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
on December 24, 2017, pursuant to the IAD. Taylor requested a speedy trial and a jury trial was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877939 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and wire tap without a court order, speedy trial violation, sentence modification and mitigating factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158873 - 2017-09-21
and wire tap without a court order, speedy trial violation, sentence modification and mitigating factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
In Re the Matter of The Extension of Orders and Interim Rule Concerning Continuation of Jury Trials, Suspension of Statutory Deadlines for Non-Criminal Jury Trials, and Remote Hearings During the Covid-19 Pandemic
dissented from that order because it violates the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the United States
/news/docs/jurytrials.pdf - 2020-05-22
dissented from that order because it violates the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the United States
/news/docs/jurytrials.pdf - 2020-05-22
[PDF]
In Re the Matter of The Extension of Orders and Interim Rule Concerning Continuation of Jury Trials, Suspension of Statutory Deadlines for Non-Criminal Jury Trials, and Remote Hearings During the Covid-19 Pandemic
dissented from that order because it violates the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the United States
/news/docs/jurytrials2.pdf - 2020-05-22
dissented from that order because it violates the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the United States
/news/docs/jurytrials2.pdf - 2020-05-22