Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 559 for widths.
Search results 501 - 510 of 559 for widths.
Frontsheet
and shall be 40 feet in width. It is undisputed that the legal description in the easement describes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52414 - 2010-07-19
and shall be 40 feet in width. It is undisputed that the legal description in the easement describes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52414 - 2010-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they dispute the width of the easement, the use of the easement for “ingress and egress,” or its use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136371 - 2026-06-23
they dispute the width of the easement, the use of the easement for “ingress and egress,” or its use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136371 - 2026-06-23
[PDF]
WI APP 39
, ¶30 (stating that when the deed granted “an easement 20 feet in width” on riparian land, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
, ¶30 (stating that when the deed granted “an easement 20 feet in width” on riparian land, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528487 - 2022-08-10
[PDF]
WI 93
West to Erin Road and shall be 40 feet in width. 4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52414 - 2014-09-15
West to Erin Road and shall be 40 feet in width. 4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52414 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
AKG Real Estate, LLC v. Patrick J. Kosterman
course as the 1960 easement. This second easement was 66 feet wide. By increasing the width
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25925 - 2017-09-21
course as the 1960 easement. This second easement was 66 feet wide. By increasing the width
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25925 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84090 - 2012-06-25
over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84090 - 2012-06-25
[PDF]
May 10, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63995 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
March 14, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
May 5, 2011
an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63750 - 2014-09-15
an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
May 24, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64838 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64838 - 2014-09-15