Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 501 - 510 of 556 for widths.
Search results 501 - 510 of 556 for widths.
Frontsheet
over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84090 - 2012-06-25
over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84090 - 2012-06-25
[PDF]
WI 64
by driving over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84090 - 2014-09-15
by driving over an elevated median that was five feet, eight inches in width. Deputy Frami testified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Campbell v. City of La Crosse
was connected to the City of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5708 - 2017-09-19
was connected to the City of Racine by a corridor that varied in width from 152 feet to 306 feet. 24 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5708 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
May 10, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63995 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63995 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
March 14, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61084 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
May 5, 2011
an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63750 - 2014-09-15
an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
May 24, 2011
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64838 - 2014-09-15
and buildings within an alleged right-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64838 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
February 16, 2011
-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60220 - 2014-09-15
-of-way rebuts the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60220 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
April 13, 2011
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62918 - 2014-09-15
the presumption of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62918 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
January 21, 2011
of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31. Whether
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59300 - 2014-09-15
of a four-rod (66 feet) width accorded to an unrecorded highway under Wis. Stat. § 82.31. Whether
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59300 - 2014-09-15