Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5001 - 5010 of 63869 for records/1000.
Search results 5001 - 5010 of 63869 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. William C. Hartwig
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an No. 95-0177-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an No. 95-0177-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8532 - 2017-09-19
State v. William C. Hartwig
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an affirmative showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8532 - 2005-03-31
and was competent to proceed pro se. We conclude that the record does not reveal an affirmative showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307351 - 2020-11-24
. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307351 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680130 - 2023-07-19
, and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680130 - 2023-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 The record in this case does not include a transcript of the jury trial. No. 2019AP171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20
. 2 The record in this case does not include a transcript of the jury trial. No. 2019AP171
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242480 - 2019-06-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
the admissibility of child witnesses’ recorded statements, and State v. Snider, 2003 WI App 172, 266 Wis. 2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31926 - 2014-09-15
the admissibility of child witnesses’ recorded statements, and State v. Snider, 2003 WI App 172, 266 Wis. 2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31926 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to excusable neglect. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071611 - 2026-02-05
to excusable neglect. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071611 - 2026-02-05
State v. David Sautier
on his guilty pleas. At his sentencing hearing, portions of the PSI were read into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
on his guilty pleas. At his sentencing hearing, portions of the PSI were read into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Kohel never received a response. Kohel also sent an open record request for any video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09
.” Kohel never received a response. Kohel also sent an open record request for any video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09